I shall be
a bit shorter than what was the original plan. It is partly because I really am
not an expert in contemporary art, and partly because I have had an extremely
busy fortnight. As I said, next is Hell Hound: New Gothic Art by Francesca Gavin.
In this
book there is no chapters per se. There is an introduction and the artists. What is
to be noticed is that Gothic is not used as a synonym to Goth (as a
sub-culture) it has certain similarity, but it is not representing the
sub-culture or it's collective view of art.
I am going
to aggravate a tiny bit, to make the differences between books more visible and
also perhaps to stir some objections.
As said,
compared to the earlier book, Gothic Art NOW, there is no chapters, or one
could say each artist is a chapter. In Gothic Art NOW the artworks presented
are more the popular view of what does Gothic (in the sense of being submissive
to the term Goth) art look like. There was a point, that some of the artist
presented in Gothic Art NOW do not consider themselves to be goths or their art
to be gothic.
In Hell
Hound I think it is even less that way. In the introduction term Gothic is almost
reduced to mean the same thing as fear. The artists introduced are somehow
dealing with fear, politics and society or the concept of art itself in their
work.
Of coarse
it is quite visible why goths like these artists, or why people in general
consider them to be presenting dark aesthetics. There is a certain sinister
allure in the artworks mentioned whether they are paintings, video
installations or statues. I can't say I instantly fell in love with every
artist or liked every work, but they do give a bigger picture of all art that
could be considered gothic or even goth.
The variety
of styles, methods and concepts is remarkable considering the way Gothic Art
Now presented different works of art, or artists.
Nevertheless,
I strongly recommend to explore both of the books I shortly presented.
Next time: Degradation and Renaissance: Decadence in Finland's Fine Arts and Literature